Unexpected Correlations
in Fama-MacBeth Methodology Outcomes
-- Laurent Cavenaile, David Dubois and Jaroslav
Hlávka
This paper examines the Fama-MacBeth test of asset pricing models through its application to the
Fama and French model. The Fama and French 25 sorted portfolios, 30 industrial portfolios and
their combination have been used. The data of monthly observations span over the period 1963-2008.
Fama-MacBeth results reject the validity of the Fama and French model, but the presence of
unexpected correlation casts doubt on these results.
© 2011 IUP. All Rights Reserved.
Capital Asset Pricing Model: Evidence from the
Stock Exchange of Mauritius
-- Subadar Agathee Ushad
The aim of this paper is to examine whether the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is able to
explain the stock returns in the Mauritian stock market. The sample in the present study consists of all
securities listed on the official market of the Stock Exchange of Mauritius (SEM). Using data from 1998 to
2007, the study provides minor support for the three-moment CAPM, with no significant support for either
the two-moment or the four-moment CAPM in the case of SEM.
© 2011 IUP. All Rights Reserved.
Illiquidity Premium
and Stylized Equity Returns
-- Arshad Hassan and Muhammad Tariq Javed
This study examines the relationship between illiquidity premium and equity returns in Pakistani
equity market for the period 2000:6 to 2007:6 by using Fama and French (1992 and 1993) methodology.
This is the first study that explores the relationship between illiquidity premium and equity returns
in Pakistan by employing a large sample of more than 250 stocks listed on the Karachi Stock
Exchange. An analysis of the results reveals that illiquidity premium is priced by market and it is
significantly negatively related to equity market returns. It means that high liquidity stocks earn higher return
in comparison to low liquidity stocks. Traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) is found to be
valid as market factor is significant in explaining portfolio returns. However, the explanatory power of
the two-factor model is 5% higher than the explanatory power of conventional CAPM. These results are
in line with the findings of Hwang and Lu (2007) for the UK market and Eun and Huang (2007) for
the Chinese equity market. However, empirical evidence contradicts that of Amihud and Mendelson
(1986) who argue that low liquidity stocks earn higher return as compensation for taking illiquidity risk.
As illiquidity premium exists in equity markets, so decision makers should consider it along with
market premium in making decisions regarding investment, financing and valuation of financial
instruments. The results are important, in the sense, that they can facilitate investors in efficient resource allocation.
© 2011 IUP. All Rights Reserved.
Trade Settlement Failures in US Bond Markets
-- Susanne Trimbath
This study estimates the total value of trade settlement failures in the US bond markets. Analyzing
data from multiple sources, it shows that the value of settlement failures is rising. Regulatory and
market efforts to reduce the problem have been largely unsuccessful. In April 2008, fails to deliver in
bond markets reached a peak value of $600 bn, a fail rate of nearly 9%. The resulting loss of tax
revenue on payments in lieu of interest (on tax-exempt municipal and Treasury securities) is found to be $42
mn per year to the federal government and $271 mn per year to the states. The loss of use of funds
to investors as a result of securities paid for but not received is found to be $7 bn per year.
© 2011 IUP. All Rights Reserved.
|